GEORGE BARNSBY BLOG NO.530 THURSDAY 31ST JULY 2008 www.gbpeopleslibrary.co.uk
Thursday, July 31st, 2008GORDON BROWN AND HIS CABINET OF WARMONGERS ARE STILL AT LARGE.
. That these mass murderers are still at large and are allowed to get on
with their normal murderous business is no consolation to the people of Iraq
and particularly members of Iraq’s Communist Party and Trade Union
Federation whose Oil Workers in particular fight the sale of their oil and
other assets to Bush, Blair and Brown. Today there is some movement as the
murderers fall out with each other . David Miliband, the foreign secretary
and therefore the chief murderer after Brown denies that he is weakening
Brown and the Labour Party, but the policies he puts are the usual New
Labour hypocrisies of ‘listening to the people’ with never a mention of the
war in Iraq. And where is Brown, the chief murderer who should be under lock
and key? He’s having a nice holiday in Suffolk.
And where are those who understand that Brown should be arraigned
before the Court of Human Rights at the Hague and each of us possesses the
right to make a Citizen’s Arrest? Well, apart from Lance Dunkley and I who
have served a Citizen’s Arrest on Rob Marris, my MP, who has not yet
responded, George Galloway who I suggested should arrest Gordon Brown in
Parliament has obviously not had an opportunity to do this in Parliament,
although he might contemplate taking some members of Respect to Suffolk to
arrest Brown. The same thing applies to the Archbishop of Canterbury who
also
has enough on his plate with religious matters, but at least he, like
Galloway might think of some other method under our own legal system, or the
constitution of the United Nations whereby Brown should be prevented NOW
from taking his grisly daily diet of murder.
THE WARMONGERS IN ENGLAND AND WOLVERHAMPTON.
I am almost loathe to discuss lesser affairs while Brown remains at
large, but life goes on. I start with one of the people who has decided to
talk to me. It is Peter Barron of the BBC who answers my question of who
decides the questions on Any Questions and were the questions fiddled on the
night the programme was in Wolverhampton with the Foreign Secretary David
Miliband. Peter explains that the email I sent him did nor reach him because
I had spelled his name Baron wrongly . This excuses him the ticking off I
gave him when he didn’t reply. He goes on to explain that what is read on
air is a combination of the presenter, the programme editor and the
producers.
The news summary scripts are written by the producers and tweaked
by the presenters. He ends politely wishing me well and it almost answers
all my question. The one thing it fails to do is to deal with the allegation
that on the night Any Questions was in Wolverhampton and the foreign
minister (David Miliband) was one the main speakers it was alleged that
questions too critical of the government were disallowed. Can we have an
answer to that question please Mr. Barron?
The fact that Mr.Barron can answer my questions shows that other
public figures should answer me as well. The main culprits are Paxman, Marr,
Wark, Kearney and Jon Snow who have no intention of replying to my charges
that by not challenging Blair when they interviewed him before the war in
Iraq they allowed Blair to hang on to Bush’s coat tails and support the
illegal, racist and unwinnable war in Iraq. They also, by this action became
accessories to the conflict and their silence (now repeated about 60 times)
finally removed the last basis people of a democratic society have of
exercising control over their leaders. If Peter Barron can reply to me, so
will Paxman and Co. have to reply to me eventually.
A similar state of affairs holds in local politics where Phil Bateman
of Travel West Midland and until the May 1st debacle a Wednesfield
Councillor has replied to a quite complicated question of who runs and
who controls our local transport system. This markedly contrasts with
Richard
Cross, the ?120,000 pa Chief Executive of Wolverhampton who has no intention
at all of replying to my question of who runs and controls Wolverhampton.
This is such a complex issue of innumerable so-called regeneration bodies,
some of them competing with each other, that I have a perfect right to put
the question and Cross to answer it. I will put it to him again that the
machinations of these usually penniless bodies is likely to involve
corruption and the case of St.Modwens Property developers who operate
throughout the country and have left Wolverhampton Eye Infirmary an eyesore
after having insufficient funds on this site (and many others) to build
commercial properties and houses, particularly the Eye Infirmary which is a
listed building.
I also raise the question of the new political situation in
Wolverhampton where a coalition of Tory and Lib-Dems are now in charge of
Wolverhampton, but are failing to answer my request that the council should
be composed of Tories who are opposed to the war in Iraq, of Lib-Dems who
have always opposed the war, and Labour councillors who oppose the war. The
present non-response by the new leader of the council Councillor Neville
Patten leaves me fearful that he supports the war in Iraq and that he is a
Tory of the old reactionary school. Set my mind at rest, please Neville
THE STRUGGLE CONTINUES
INDEX
BLOG NO 530 THURSDAY 31ST JULY 2008.
1.GORDON BROWN AND HIS CABINET OF WARMONGERS ARE STILL AT LARGE.
2.THE WARMONGERS IN ENGLAND AND WOLVERHAMPTON.