GEORGE BARNSBY BLOG SUNDAY 30 MARCH 2008 www.gbpeoplelibrary.co.uk
Monday, March 31st, 2008I’M STILL WAITING FOR SOMEONE TO JOIN ME IN DENOUNCING THE ROYAL FAMILY AS
WAR MONGERS.
Still no one has joined me in denouncing the Royals. But I think I have
discovered that I didn’t actually send a notice to them, they being too posh
to have an email address. So I can’t complain if they haven’t replied to me.
So an ordinary letter will be sent post haste to Clarence House London
where the Prince of Wales , together with his two sons live, no doubt as
snug as a bug in a
rug.
My criticism of Charles and Harry as war mongers was based on the fact
that not only did they welcome Harry back from Afghanistan which is quite
proper, but they also endorsed his own view that he was proud of what he had
done and hoped to return to the fighting.
I absolved Queenie from this criticism remarking that she was too wily
a bird talk politics in public
even though other heads of state have publicly joined their citizens in
condemning the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. The value of the
BLOG to my mind is that it allows every
citizen a voice and that includes the royal family. Prince Charles has shown
that he is not prepared to be a silent and supports and finances projects
many of which are
admirable. We have learned much about royalty over recent months. The
princes have spoken out regarding their mother and even that old war horse,
Prince Phillip, who durst be let off a chain for fear of a public gaffe has
been found to be a kindly old soul who said nice things about Dianne.
The BLOG brings freedom of expression for all citizens, wise and
foolish,
young and old, and children who are old enough to speak their mind. There
seems to be no reason why the royal family should not join the human race
and say what they think even if Harry is daft enough in my view to want to
rejoin the army and either he or his brother donned Nazi uniform and said
Heil Hitler. The present state of Britain is disastrous with civil liberties
curtailed for every body. The BLOG gives us a chance, perhaps the last
chance, of living in a democratic society where all are equal. Let’s grab it
while we
can, for it is quite certain that the ruling class will try to take it away
from us.
ENOCH POWELL - THE VILEST OF MEN.
The fortieth anniversary of the ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech has come and
gone as has the BBC programme commemorating it. We, as well as our regional
paper, the Express and Star agree that it was actually a River of Lies, but
we differ with regard to our interpretation of the event. The BBC report
concentrated on the part the Express and Star played in exposing Powell,
but failed to mention the most important ethnic minority witness to the
events, Lance Dunkley. Since it was the ethnic minority people who suffered
discrimination, racist attacks and even death, as the Stephen Lawrence case
showed , this is inexcusable.
Lance, Surgit Singh Kalsa and I met yesterday and promised a full
report. This will take some time and this is to be taken as an interim
report until then. Lance lived in the same street that Powell had his
Wolverhampton office and residence. Lance was a bus driver whose regular
conductress was Eunice Parry who lived nearby. They agree that the lady
Powell quotes as being the one who began as living in an all-white street
but ending with her as the only white person elaborated with lies about
excrement through her letter box and picaninies knocking on her door asking
to use her telephone were figments of Powell’s fevered imagination and his
refused to reveal her name was not to protect her from discrimination, but
because she didn’t exist.
The only possible lady was Druscilla Cotterell in Brighton Place. But
her existence was revealed by the Daily Mail at the time of the speech in
1968 and is fully documented in my 19 page BLOG of 7 Feb 2007 to Esther
White the BBC reporter who passed on to me the information that the Daily
Mail was again republishing their findings on the eve of the proposed
broadcast. The speech
reverberates today as the debate over immigration and integration continues
to dominate the political agenda. Our interim report is buttressed by the
following features. Lance and his bus conductress friend Eunice Parry are to
be reunited. That Eunice knew Colleen Moore a Scottish lady who was alleged
to live in Brighton Place (although the 1971 Census fails to reveal such a
person) and as she was not known to Lance we considered her an unreliable
witness or, even non-existent. But Eunice now says that they went to school
in Wolverhampton together so we will get Colleen’s address from Peter Rhodes
who
believed that Colleen had written to Enoch Powell urging that no further
black immigration be allowed because it ‘lowered the tone of the
neighbourhood’ So we shall hope to get the truth of that tale.
But the main ethnic minority person involved in the affair is Lance
Dunkley and the whole episode must be re-written from the point of view of
the Black and Asian peoples who suffered most from Powell’s lies..Our final
report will be published in due course.
THE HISTORIANS’ LETTER TO THE BBC TRUST.
News of fresh cuts in BBC services gives point to a letter published
in the Guardian on October 2 2007 It is a letter to the trustees of the BBC.
It reads;
We the undersigned note with concern the rumours that BBC2’s Timewatch may
be one of the respected documentary strands that is axed in the current
review of programming forced by the revenue shortfall from last January’s
new licence settlement.
Timewatch is the BBC’s flagship history series, and has for over 25
years produced the type of high quality,original and thought provoking
history programmes that are all too rare in today’s television schedules.
We would ask the trustees to consider the dire implications for history
on TV if the Timewatch strand is lost. We believe it would lead to fewer
serious history programme and more history-lite reality shows. In the long
term it might even signal the beginning of the end for history on-screen, to
the detriment of the public and its sources of information on the British
past.
It is signed by about 35 distinguished historians. This concerns the
programme of Tony Robinson who we are busy chasing to participate in and
referee the important Battle of Tettenhall AD 910 which some people think
was fought at Wednesfield and on which Councillor Phil Bateman has already
contacted Robinson . Only this week we discussed primary school teachers
and pupils being mobilised for such field work and perhaps excavations. Such
investigations are of national importance and would bolster our case for
Wolverhampton being considered the City of Culture, Education, Sport and
Business in 2009.