Archive for August, 2005

AUGUST 2005

Wednesday, August 10th, 2005

BLAIRITES TARGET WOLVERHAMPTON

We are very pleased to announce that more than one Labour councillor is opposed to the continuation of the war against Iraq. How many we do not yet know and we will find out. We are also pleased to announce that our relations with both Roger Lawrence, the Labour leader of W’ton Council and also the present Mayor, Phil Bateman are much improved. We apologise for any misunderstandings. This is more than the Blairites or closers of Bilston Community College are ever likely to do. I never apologise, as Blunkett once famously said.

POMP AND CIRCUMSTANCE

Councillor Peter O’Neill raised the question of banning the so-called Land of Hope and Glory because it had racist connotations. He was later informed that this was political correctness gone mad and withdrew his objections.
The fact is that words were put to the music of one of our greatest composers, Sir Edward Elgar against his bitter protests. ‘Wider still and wider shall they bounds be set’ is clearly jingoistic and as Sir Winston Churchill observed, patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Elgar was always a peace loving person, indeed he was a conscientious objector during World War 2. At present the far right BNP and local racists such as John Mellor wrap themselves round the union jack making it difficult for real patriots to find a suitable national anthem.

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS

We have had a least a couple of forays recently into the vexed question of freedom for journalists and newscasters to control the material they work with. The present position for newscasters is that the news we watch is Blair-speak. The real terrorists are Bush and Blair and what is needed is an agreed standard of objectivity world wide.
We taunted Jeremy Paxman with being an April fool for devoting a whole programme of Newsnight to an entirely imaginary terrorist attack on Britain complete with lurid details of non-existent ricin poisoning which enabled Blunkett to come out of his hidey hole and recommend further limits to our civil rights when were it not for the real terrorists, Blair and Blunkett, we would be much less troubled with terrorists.
Our second document addressed four newscasters Andrew Marr, Jon Snow, Jeremy Paxman and Jonathon Dimbleby who we know to be principled opponents of the war in Iraq to consider a united front of both left and right to oppose the war. Those on the right include the Daily Mail, our important local paper the Express and Star, Max Hastings the distinguished right leaning military historian, Will Hutton, the critic of the US financial system and many other organisations and individuals. In fact, if the Tory Party is ever to present effective opposition to Blair it will have to repudiate its present policy of support for the war in Iraq. I have watched newscaster such as Martha Kearney virtually squirm at the material they are given to read, but their only alternative is to resign, which is no solution at all.
We suggested that an existing form of objective reporting might be the Arabic news agency Al Jazeera which had newly opened an office in London.
Here are some latest developments. Aljazzera.net English is now on the internet. Its proclaimed aim is to bring peoples and continents together with news which is objective and accurate. The ultimate aim is to establish a proactive relationship with its audience who will communicate with it, criticising and adding to its content.
The most important development has been that Telesur, the creation of Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, is contemplating a link up with Aljazeera as an alternative to the existing links with the US media, such as CNN. This would give an alternative news service to every country and every person who speaks English. The question for us is what view English journalists and trade unionists will take of these developments towards a genuinely free and objective press.
However, the main problem is to have a newspaper which can be read at breakfast, taken to work and used all day. After much public dissatisfaction with newspapers and journalists, circulation is again rising. A solution of sorts is offered by Richard Hill whose aim is to create a new national daily newspaper with left/green ethics run by no single party or movement but that gives a legitimate and ultimately respectable voice to all across this spectrum. Who is Richard Hill? Well, he is like thousands of
us, an active but disillusioned left wing campaigner anxious to move things forward. Currently the left has only one daily newspaper, the Morning Star, and weekly papers such as (I’m extending Richard’s list) Socialist Worker/Review, New Statesman, Tribune, and the black newspaper, The Voice. There are also the magazines, mostly monthly such as Red Pepper, Searchlight etc., and quarterlys such as New Left Review, Race and Class and Soundings to quote only favourites of mine. Then on the World Wide Web there is Indymedia giving a world wide left persective. Taking all these and the more progressive newspapers, such as the Guardian, Observer, Independent there is sufficient financial resources and technical know how to establish and maintain an alternative mass newspaper. Richard Hill offers a website, thepaper@hotmail.co.uk and a promise to continue to contact all who are willing to give his project their support. The difficulties are enormous, but the potential results are incalculable. National newspapers have been founded in the fairly recent past, the Daily Herald by George Lansbury and trade unions, Reynolds News by the Co-operative Movement. It can be done, and now is the time to do it.

MEETING STAN NEWENS

Stan Newens the ex Essex MP for Epping and former MEP for Central London has, ever since World War 2 been considered by me to be an honorary Black Country man. This arises from his having been a Bevin boy working in pits around Stoke and co-operating with the Wolverhampton twins Ray and Alan Garner in building up Labour Party youth organisation. Stan has also been a committee member and chairman of the Movement for Colonial Freedom which later became Liberty and last year wrote a history of the movement. Although Stan has been in contact with me as a historian of the labour movement in the Black Country and Birmingham from the 1960s we had not previously met face to face, so it was with great mutual pleasure that Stan last week drove from Bridgnorth where he was visiting friends to Wolverhampton to discuss old times. Both Ray and Alan Garner became Wolverhampton councillors after the war. Ray suffered long term kidney failure and died in 1997, his younger brother Alan died a year earlier from cancer.

CLAUDIA JONES

A final connection of Stan Newens and myself is that he has recently become Vice-Chairman of the Socialist History Society and he has become a main contact in a controversy regarding Claudia Jones the black Communist activist. In 1955 Claudia became a victim of the McCarthy terror and was exiled to Britain, a country she had never known. Despite being in bad health and friendless Claudia became the founder of the Notting Hill Carnival which was and remains the great statement of African-Caribbean culture in Britain.
At a later stage, Claudia accused the British Communist Party of not having the same understanding of black politics as the USA Communist Party and specifically that all papers of Claudia were not deposited in the British CP archives in Manchester. The story of the life of Claudia in Britain has been written by Marika Sherwood, a founder member of the Black and Asian Studies Association and a prolific writer on race relations. She details the charges of papers not deposited. This has been denied by Francis King and other historians involved in sending material to the CP archives. But I tend to agree with Marika that the CP has not given proper priority to the question of the ‘color-line’ which our famous Communist colleague WEB du Bois said was the most important issue of the twentieth century and is even more important in the twenty first century.

BILSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE

This is the first Multicultural College in Britain that was closed, but refuses to go away. The present position is that anyone who studies the matter knows that BCC should not have been closed nor should the Wolverhampton City College have been opened and the Express & Star which paradoxically was in large part to blame for its closure is now busy opposing those who closed it.
This is not the place to rehearse the whole sorry story, this has been made clear in both our web sites Friends of Bilston Community College (BCC) and also www.gbpeopleslibrary.co.uk. Present intention is to marvel at the effrontery and impropriety, if not actual illegality of those who closed the college. For instance the Further Education Funding Council (FEFC) had to close the college in great haste before ethnic minority people realised what was happening and objected! Local collaborators with the closure of BCC, particularly the Wolverhampton University Vice-Chancellor John Brookes achieved a near miraculous feat in putting together an alternative board of BCC governors after FEFC had dismissed the original board, whose sole duty was to vote themselves out of existence to make way for the new improperly set up Wolverhampton College!
Further developments were that the Friends charged the Learning and Skills Council with racism in supporting the closure of BCC in September 2004 to which the LSC had not replied by December and it was clear that they did not intend to reply. The LSC had joined the ranks of those whose constitutions lauded openness and attention to complaints but practise which entirely ignore criticism unwelcome to it. In August 2005 it is once again time to make the charge of racism against the LSC. In addition the West Midlands Police were asked questions regarding the enquiry it had conducted on BCC which eventually concluded that no illegalities had occurred. Such questions were asked as the number of officers involved, the cost of the enquiry, whether any government department had contacted the police with regard to the enquiry etc. No satisfactory reply was received and with the passing of the Freedom of Information 2005 Act we are now seeking this missing information. There is now also the fact that no one at BCC was charged with any offence and the LSC took the foolish step of charging the auditors with wrongly authorising work at the college. The LSC and the auditors then settled out of court coming to a mutual agreement which they had no intention of sharing with the public until an outcry from the Express and Star and the FE Focus of the Times Educational Supplement and a number of MPs demanded the terms of the agreement be disclosed. This has still not been done. But the auditors, the great monopoly firm of Deloitte and Touche, requested from both the ex- principal of BCC and its principal finance officer information to help them rebut the charges of the LSC. These were mainly charges that so-called authorisation of illegal work were charges made retrospectively and were legal at the time. The fact that the LSC has remained silent is no surprise, but we have been slow to realise that Deloitte has acted in at least an unethical way in seeking information from BCC officers and then leaving them in the lurch by coming to terms with the LSC. So this omission we are on the verge of correcting.
It is clear from the above that Bilston Community College should not have been closed. No charges against the College have ever been laid. But there remains the question of human rights for those who have been unjustly accused and whose careers have been terminated or blighted. These matters remain to be settled.

CHERIE BOOTH

Cherie’s defence of the traditional judicial system, independent judges and juries is to be much welcomed. It was written under her maiden name of Cherie Booth. This was surely meant to put forward views different from those of her husband. Tony Blair denies this but he cannot deny that Cherie also disassociates herself from other fundamental aspects of Blairism and that on a recent visit to the US she criticised Bush’s policy on terrorism and also on gay rights. All this leads me to brings up the question of the role of Blair’s women and the experience of them regarding Bilston Community College. All of them, of course are Blairites otherwise they would not have been appointed. The first was Lady Blackstone. She was Education Secretary at the time when Margaret Thatcher’s education policy came to grief. Thatcher policy was to turn further education colleges from education institutations into business corporations by allowing colleges to compete with each other charging firms for their services with the aim of eventually removing FE from public sector finances altogether and turning them into public corporations. The policy collapsed when the Further Education Funding Council had to issue virtually hundreds of regulations to so-called ‘failed’ colleges such as Bilston and Halton which had expanded enormously under this system.
Lady Blackstone received very short shrift from Parliament for allowing so many millions to be allegedly owed to the government and from that time on she showed no mercy to BCC. The other two Blairite women were Margaret Hodge and Estelle Morris both of whom took shelter in refusing to answer Friends enquiries after BCC had been cleared by the Fraud Squad of charges of illegal practices.

PROGRESS OF THE GB BLOG

So, another BLOG comes to an end with much business still to be dealt with. The original intention is being fulfilled. That is for me to record all matters of interest to me and these matters should then be taken up, or not taken up by other people. At present I seem able to produce about two paper editions per month of fairly comprehensive analysis. But I know I am living on borrowed time, as exemplified by the sad death of our good comrade Robin Cook. Perhaps I shall be able to open up the BLOG for other people to participate in. We shall see.

Open Letter to Councillor Phil Bateman Mayor of Wolverhampton

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2005

Dear Phil

Thank you for taking the trouble to send me your long and very interesting email in reply to my letter of 21 June 05. I did not know that your anti-racist activities went back to Som Raj, the killing of Clinton McCurbin and anti-Nazi marches in London. I was also involved in these activities with the Wolverhampton Race Equality Council, and it is strange that our paths have never crossed and I have never, as far as I know, either heard you speak or spoken to you.

I am pleased that you call yourself a Socialist and that you are proud of the little that you have been able to achieve so far in your life. I feel exactly the same way. I am proud of being a Communist and despite Communist Parties being hijacked by criminals and psychopaths believe that Marxist principles are more important than the villainies of individuals and this seems to be in accord with public opinion which has recently voted Karl Marx the most famous philosopher in the world. I am proud also of the books I have written on the working class movement of the Black Country and Birmingham from 1600 to 1939, also my writings on Race Relations.

But I am particularly pleased that both you and Roger Lawrence have been civilised enough to understand that if anyone writes a letter, they are entitled to a reply, because our experience with the Blairites, who have hijacked the Labour Party so that spin and deceit takes the place of honesty and integrity.

This has been particularly the case of Bilston Community College of which I have had the honour of being the Spokesperson since the Friends of Bilston Community College were set up in 1999. You will be aware, Phil, of the history of this College. It was set up by W’ton Council to serve the deprived area of Bilston by educating those who could not claim further education by qualifications such as GCEs, but it would educate anyone who presented themselves. In this way it became a multicultural college with 30% of ethnic minority staff, never equalled before or since, and served in particular deprived ethnic minority students and white unemployed.

As you know, the College was closed by Blunkett and Blair under false charges of vast debts, inefficiency and fraud. The closure could not have been effected without the collaboration of the then Vice-Chancellor, John Brookes and others of Wolverhampton University. Brookes tried to silence me by threatening me with legal proceedings, as did the Express & Star who still will not publish anything from George Barnsby or Friends of Bilston Community College.

The present position is that no one from the college has been questioned or charged with any offence; that the Further Education Funding Council charged the auditors, Deloitte and Touche, with irregularities which ended with the two agreeing to a settlement out of court. But they had no intention of informing the general public what that settlement was, until challenged by MPs and the press. There the matter rests, except that the policy of the FEFC was taken over by its successor the monstrous quango Learning & Skills Council which we charged with racism in 2004 and from whom we have had no reply, as usual.

Incidentally, we believe that the town council set up Bilston Community College and that the City council should determine by a debate whether it supports that decision and makes the necessary minor alterations to the Board of Governors favourable to a restoration of the Bilston site to its status as a Community College or whether it accepts the present position.

Finally, I have not asked you whether you support the continuance of the war in Iraq. It is now vital to know this since the decision of the SE W’ton Labour Party to vote for a Blairite candidate in the recent general election and the betrayal of Dennis Turner in ignoring the principles of the majority of his constituents and accepting a well subsidised seat in the House of Lords, thus bringing McFadden, an important aide of Blair into the city. We began with the proposition that only one Labour councillor is opposed to the continuation of the war in Iraq. This we now know is not correct, but constituents are entitled to know the views of all Labour councillors on the Iraq war and we shall continue to seek the views of Labour councillors in the other two Constituency Labour Parties in Wolverhampton, with a view to obtaining a majority against the continuation of the war in all three CLPs in the city.

Let me end by again thanking you for acting in a principled way by replying to my letter. I’m not concerned with any differences of opinion there might be between us, only that any there be are settled in a principled manner. This you are doing.

Best regards

George Barnsby
31.07.05